Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Journal Friday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Big Hill' vindicated in Las Vegas Court



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
05 September 2008
Buncrana businessman Pat 'Big Hill' Doherty can rest easier this week, after a Las Vegas judge dismissed a case against his company, Harcourt Developments.
Harcourt Nevada, a subsidiary of Harcourt Developments is currently building a 600m euro scheme in Las Vegas, called Sullivan Square.

The company contracted a local developer Glen, Smith and Glen (GSG) as a 40% minority partner in the project, which involves construction of 1,300 apartments, office buildings, a 1.5 acre park and 25 shops in one of America's premier resorts.

However, GSG filed two claims in a Nevada court, alleging that there had been a breach of fiduciary duty and that Harcourt was attempting to dilute its involvement in the scheme.

The potential court action set off alarm bells as far away as Jersey, in the Channel Islands, where Harcourt Developments is involved in another high profile project, Esplanade Quarter. Jersey's parliament ordered an audit of Harcourt's finances in relation to the St Helier project and is requiring that its preferred developer agreement be reconfirmed.

Harcourt Developments released a statement this week, which said: "Given the level of recent press interest in the matter, we would like to communicate the progress of the court action against Harcourt's subsidiary in Las Vegas. On August 7, 2008, the order of the Clark County District Court dismissed the claims of breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty made against Harcourt Nevada."

One further claim remains against the Nevada subsidiary, that the company failed to repay GSG $2.1m which it had spent on the project. However, Harcourt "unequivocally denies these claims were within the approved budget and the approved business plan".

A counter claim is currently being prepared.

The company is also facing a suit due to be heard in Dublin's Commercial Court next month. Three individuals claim to have been excluded from the partnership set up to develop the Jersey scheme.

The full article contains 323 words and appears in Journal Friday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 September 2008 11:05 AM
  • Source: Journal Friday
  • Location: Derry
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.