Two injuries after Flybe plane had to land on its nose due to faulty sensor: AAIB

A sensor failure resulted in the pilot of a Flybe flight into Belfast City Airport burning fuel, diverting, and landing the plane on its nose at Belfast International Airport, according to a report by the Air Accident Investigation Branch published this morning.
The plane on the runway at Belfast International Airport.The plane on the runway at Belfast International Airport.
The plane on the runway at Belfast International Airport.

Two passengers suffered minor injuries in the incident, which occurred on November 10, 2017, at 1.30 p.m. and involved a De Havilland Canada Dash 8 turbo-propeller aircraft operated by Flybe, the AAIB stated.

Fifty-seven people - 53 passengers and four crew - were on board the plane.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The aircraft sustained damage to the underside of its nose, front pressure bulkhead, nose landing gear and landing gear doors.

"The aircraft was carrying out the third sector of a four-sector day from Belfast City Airport to Inverness Airport. After takeoff, the landing gear was selected up. Cockpit indications indicated that the main landing gear (MLG) retracted normally but the nose landing gear (NLG) did not," the AAIB reported.

"The crew carried out the actions in the relevant abnormal checklists and were unable to lower the NLG. After burning off fuel, the aircraft was diverted to Belfast International Airport where it landed with the NLG retracted.

"The crew initiated an emergency evacuation. It was determined that a damaged electrical harness on one of the nose landing gear proximity sensors caused an erroneous signal, which resulted in the forward NLG doors starting to close while the NLG was still in transit to the up position.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"The nose landing gear tyres contacted the forward doors, causing the NLG to rotate off-centre. Although the NLG subsequently retracted, the forward doors remained open and the tyres became jammed in the NLG bay.

"This prevented the nose landing gear from extending when subsequently commanded. The damage to the harness resulted from a cyclically-driven fatigue failure mechanism, which occurred because the harness had been secured with a non-flexible cable tie which restricted it from flexing during normal nose landing gear operation," it explained.

The in-depth AAIB report states that the two minor injuries sustained by the passengers occurred during the evacuation of the aircraft after its unorthodox landing at Aldergrove.

"The aircraft manufacturer has taken action to clarify nose landing gear proximity sensor harness routing and attachment instructions in the Aircraft Maintenance Manual, and has published inspection requirements.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"Following the accident, the operator carried out an inspection of the nose landing gear proximity sensor harness routing on its Dash 8 Q400 fleet and undertook rectification of any anomalies noted.

"The aircraft and landing gear manufacturers are also working to identify a more flexible harness design; this activity had been initiated before the accident to G-JEDU," said the AAIB.

Related topics: